[Igf-dev] Possible bug in schema

[Phil Hunt]

Sorry if this is repeated. It didn't seem to work the first time.

Phil Hunt
Oracle


On 13-Dec-07, at 2:00 PM, Phil Hunt wrote:

> I notice a problem that has come up with regards to "operations".   
> Operations (add, modify, delete, etc) are currently defined against  
> schema and not against Interactions.
>
> I am wondering if operations should be defined solely against  
> Interactions?
>
> We could continue to also state whether an attribute is read/ 
> writable...but I think that should be solely defined within an  
> interaction.
>
> Phil Hunt
> Oracle
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.openliberty.org/pipermail/igf-dev_lists.openliberty.org/attachments/20071213/2da2a921/attachment.html