[Igf-dev] Possible bug in schema

[Brett McDowell]

Is this only an implementation issue or also a specification issue?

On Dec 13, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Phil Hunt wrote:

> I notice a problem that has come up with regards to "operations".   
> Operations (add, modify, delete, etc) are currently defined against  
> schema and not against Interactions.
>
> I am wondering if operations should be defined solely against  
> Interactions?
>
> We could continue to also state whether an attribute is read/ 
> writable...but I think that should be solely defined within an  
> interaction.
>
> Phil Hunt
> Oracle
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igf-dev mailing list
> Igf-dev at lists.openliberty.org
> http://lists.openliberty.org/mailman/listinfo/igf-dev_lists.openliberty.org