[wsf-dev] Architecture DRAFT #1 Completed!

[George Fletcher]

Unfortunately I have a conflict this week at 11am ET so I won't be able 
to join the call. 

I've attached my notes from one of the sessions (led by Paul) that 
addressed how this might work.  However, I'm not sure it impacts the WSC 
code significantly.  It really addresses what the site needs to do to 
get the necessary "bits" to invoke the WSC library.  This goes along 
with what Scott was talking about in the last call... being able to 
provided the necessary "bits" to bootstrap the process.  So some 
potentially some library call that allows the invoker to pass in a 
DS-EPR and optionally a security token to use with that DS-EPR (provided 
the DS-EPR doesn't contain the necessary security token).

Thanks,
George

Brett McDowell wrote:
> Asa, I think you should put some time on the next call agenda to
> receive a de-brief of the Concordia sessions last week in Brussels.
>
> George F, can you join the next wsf-dev call to explain the current
> thinking regarding openID and ID-WSF integration and how that might
> impact openLiberty's WSC implementation?
>
> --Brett
>
> On 5/2/07, Asa Hardcastle <asa.openliberty at zenn.net> wrote:
>   
>> Hi All,
>>
>> The first draft of the Architecture Document has been completed!  Please
>> take a look. Comments, corrections, ideas, additions?? Please send them to
>> this list for discussion.   Curtis and I are soooooo ready to start writing
>> code.
>>
>>  thanks,
>>
>> asa
>>
>> --
>> Asa Hardcastle, Technical Lead, openLiberty
>> Tel: +1.413.429.1044 Skype: subsystem7
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wsf-dev mailing list
>> wsf-dev at openliberty.org
>> http://lists.openliberty.org/mailman/listinfo/wsf-dev
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.openliberty.org/pipermail/wsf-dev/attachments/20070502/519e1a9e/attachment.html