From asa.openliberty at zenn.net Thu Nov 1 06:51:14 2007 From: asa.openliberty at zenn.net (Asa Hardcastle) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 09:51:14 -0400 Subject: [wsf-dev] no call today Nov 1 / 2007 Message-ID: <4F341EC8-AF65-49D1-81E5-F0C8DDC40A18@zenn.net> Hi All, There will be no ClientLib developer call today. Next call is two weeks from today on November 15th at 8 A.M. Pacific. talk soon, asa -- Asa Hardcastle, Technical Lead, openLiberty ID-WSF ClientLib Tel: +1.413.429.1044 Skype: subsystem7 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openliberty.org/pipermail/wsf-dev_lists.openliberty.org/attachments/20071101/30d2e475/attachment.html From asa.openliberty at zenn.net Tue Nov 20 17:50:04 2007 From: asa.openliberty at zenn.net (Asa Hardcastle) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:50:04 -0500 Subject: [wsf-dev] Interop Tests SAML SP / LUAD anyone? Message-ID: So at this stage we have basic WSC interactions with AS and DS "working" and would like to be testing this code following the ID-WSF interoperability testing procedures outlined here: http://www.projectliberty.org/liberty/content/download/2273/15001/file/ID-WSF-2-0-TestProcedures-v1-01.pdf Our goal is to achieve the MUSTs in Table 3 / 4 outlined for WSC, at least all of those achievable with SOAP. Is anyone interested in doing some partial (and very unofficial) testing with us? asa -- Asa Hardcastle, Technical Lead, openLiberty ID-WSF ClientLib Tel: +1.413.429.1044 Skype: subsystem7 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openliberty.org/pipermail/wsf-dev_lists.openliberty.org/attachments/20071120/700ed67b/attachment.html From brett at projectliberty.org Wed Nov 21 04:49:23 2007 From: brett at projectliberty.org (Brett McDowell) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:49:23 -0500 Subject: [wsf-dev] Interop Tests SAML SP / LUAD anyone? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I just want to pile-on and say this is a key milestone for the openLiberty project. Asa and team are ready to make their Alpha available soon and the only real issue holding them back is lack of testing partners. It would be great if some of you could make some time available to test with them online. Also, for those of you with ID-WSF 1.X vs. 2.0, it might be interesting to see what Asa and team would need to do in order to interoperate with you in a "backwards compatible" way... I know Asa is very interested to know which features/use-cases he could support with ID-WSF 1.X partners. Thank you for your time and consideration. I hope some of you will be contacting Asa volunteering some cycles to test this stuff online. On Nov 20, 2007, at 8:50 PM, Asa Hardcastle wrote: > So at this stage we have basic WSC interactions with AS and DS > "working" and would like to be testing this code following the ID- > WSF interoperability testing procedures outlined here: > > http://www.projectliberty.org/liberty/content/download/2273/15001/file/ID-WSF-2-0-TestProcedures-v1-01.pdf > > Our goal is to achieve the MUSTs in Table 3 / 4 outlined for WSC, at > least all of those achievable with SOAP. > > Is anyone interested in doing some partial (and very unofficial) > testing with us? > > asa > > > > > > -- > Asa Hardcastle, Technical Lead, openLiberty ID-WSF ClientLib > Tel: +1.413.429.1044 Skype: subsystem7 > > _______________________________________________ > Wsf-dev mailing list > Wsf-dev at lists.openliberty.org > http://lists.openliberty.org/mailman/listinfo/wsf-dev_lists.openliberty.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openliberty.org/pipermail/wsf-dev_lists.openliberty.org/attachments/20071121/4de95228/attachment.html From cantor.2 at osu.edu Wed Nov 21 08:21:51 2007 From: cantor.2 at osu.edu (Scott Cantor) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:21:51 -0500 Subject: [wsf-dev] Interop Tests SAML SP / LUAD anyone? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <000b01c82c5a$a2f91210$e8eb3630$@2@osu.edu> > So at this stage we have basic WSC interactions with AS and DS "working" > and would like to be testing this code following the ID-WSF > interoperability testing procedures outlined here: > > http://www.projectliberty.org/liberty/content/download/2273/15001/file/ID- > WSF-2-0-TestProcedures-v1-01.pdf > > Our goal is to achieve the MUSTs in Table 3 / 4 outlined for WSC, at least > all of those achievable with SOAP. We have an SP you could use, but I don't think a SAML SP is what you're after, unless I'm confused about what you're trying to implement. I haven't read any of the testing procedures, so it's probably my confusion. -- Scott From asa.openliberty at zenn.net Sat Nov 24 07:01:33 2007 From: asa.openliberty at zenn.net (Asa Hardcastle) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:01:33 -0500 Subject: [wsf-dev] rejiggering deliverables Message-ID: Hi All, Over the next week we will be finishing a rejiggered delivery plan for the Client Library. Objectives have slightly changed to meet the requirements of the Liberty Interoperable Testing Procedure. As it turns out, we are further along than we thought. As soon as we've finalized, I'll post the new requirements and deliverables to the blog and the list. In the mean time. Anyone have a partially (or fully) implemented WSP? With DISCO and some service, like a "Hello Service?" later, asa -- Asa Hardcastle, Technical Lead, openLiberty ID-WSF ClientLib Tel: +1.413.429.1044 Skype: subsystem7