[wsf-dev] naming?

[Brett McDowell]

The only reason I can think of to not use openLiberty in the name might be
our longer-term goal of getting these projects into the Apache Software
Foundation.  Otherwise I don't know why we couldn't use openLiberty in the
name.

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Scott Cantor <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:

> > Also, I think "ID-WSF 2.0 ClientLib" is a bit dry for an open source
> > project name, do any of you have ideas for a name or naming?
>
> Well, we went through this before and were unable to agree on anything
> very
> profound.
>
> I wasn't too happy with the choice, but I doubt any opinions have changed
> much. The main problem, IIRC, was an inability to use the term openLiberty
> as part of the name for some reason...
>
> -- Scott
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wsf-dev mailing list
> Wsf-dev at lists.openliberty.org
>
> http://lists.openliberty.org/mailman/listinfo/wsf-dev_lists.openliberty.org
>



-- 
Brett McDowell, +1-413-652-1248, www.projectliberty.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.openliberty.org/pipermail/wsf-dev_lists.openliberty.org/attachments/20080225/84b860e4/attachment-0001.html