[wsf-dev] naming?

[Brett McDowell]

Did you literally mean "openLiberty-J" or is "-J" a placeholder for a name
for this subproject TBD?

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Scott Cantor <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:

> > The only reason I can think of to not use openLiberty in the name might
> be
> > our longer-term goal of getting these projects into the Apache Software
> > Foundation.  Otherwise I don't know why we couldn't use openLiberty in
> the
> > name.
>
> My recollection was that it was something to do with keeping the overall
> name disconnected from any specific deliverable, or something like that.
>
> Personally, I would simplify things by casting all this work as
> OpenLiberty-J and just nailing down the specific supported features (WSF
> client, server, etc) in the docs. But I argued for that originally and it
> didn't win, so...
>
> -- Scott
>
>
>


-- 
Brett McDowell, +1-413-652-1248, www.projectliberty.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.openliberty.org/pipermail/wsf-dev_lists.openliberty.org/attachments/20080226/1bd33dfa/attachment.html