[wsf-dev] naming?

[Cahill, Conor P]

I was trying to stay out of the discussion on naming... really, really
trying...

I think it is worthwhile differentiating between a client and a server
implementation
when we talk about the stuff.  So perhaps OpenLiberty-J-Client or
something that 
indicates it's the client side of Liberty in Java.

Conor

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wsf-dev-bounces at lists.openliberty.org [mailto:wsf-dev-
> bounces at lists.openliberty.org] On Behalf Of Scott Cantor
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:17 AM
> To: 'Brett McDowell'
> Cc: wsf-dev at openliberty.org
> Subject: Re: [wsf-dev] naming?
> 
> > Did you literally mean "openLiberty-J" or is "-J" a placeholder for
a
> name
> > for this subproject TBD?
> 
> No, I mean literally. Xerces is split into Xerces-J and Xerces-C, for
> example, as is OpenSAML (because I copied it).
> 
> Basically, I don't think deployers out there understand or care about
any
> distinctions inside ID-WSF. If they're at all interested, they'll
expect
> the
> package to include it all and just need to know what's actually
> implemented
> inside the release notes.
> 
> In Java, in particular, you only load classes that you use, so it
doesn't
> matter how much you bundle into one.
> 
> -- Scott
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wsf-dev mailing list
> Wsf-dev at lists.openliberty.org
> http://lists.openliberty.org/mailman/listinfo/wsf-
> dev_lists.openliberty.org