From asa.openliberty at zenn.net Tue Jan 1 13:13:29 2008 From: asa.openliberty at zenn.net (Asa Hardcastle) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:13:29 -0500 Subject: [wsf-dev] racing to the alpha finishline Message-ID: <3F01B060-F8E3-4C75-AF85-B5976918D3C1@zenn.net> Hi All, Just finished the Personal Profile Service client implementation, using DST 2.1. During this process I built the classes to support the DST and the DST Reference implementation - fully done with Query and Modify, need to build Create and Delete, but there is not too much more work required to do this. browse source here: http://openliberty.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openliberty/ PP Here: http://openliberty.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openliberty/ID_WSF_2_0/wsc/trunk/src/org/openliberty/wsc/PersonalProfileService.java?view=markup Anyway. I am off to a dinner and then this evening I'll be posting Javadoc and some "How to get started with the ID-WSF ClientLib" documents. :) Happy New Year! asa -- Asa Hardcastle, Technical Lead, openLiberty ID-WSF ClientLib Tel: +1.413.429.1044 Skype: subsystem7 From asa.openliberty at zenn.net Wed Jan 2 14:14:50 2008 From: asa.openliberty at zenn.net (Asa Hardcastle) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:14:50 -0500 Subject: [wsf-dev] ClientLib Alpha Available Message-ID: Hi Everyone, I am very pleased to announce that the ClientLib Alpha is now available online! I am working on a way to get the JavaDoc You can download and get started in 5 steps: http://openliberty.org/wiki/index.php/5_Step_Start Currently you can use the AS client and the DS client with Conor Cahill's WSP. I have completed a Personal Profile Service Client that operates on DST2.1. There is also the shell of a People Service Client. Keep in mind: This is Alpha code!!!! lots of things are not working :) asa -- Asa Hardcastle, Technical Lead, openLiberty ID-WSF ClientLib Tel: +1.413.429.1044 Skype: subsystem7 From asa.openliberty at zenn.net Wed Jan 2 20:18:43 2008 From: asa.openliberty at zenn.net (Asa Hardcastle) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 23:18:43 -0500 Subject: [wsf-dev] Phone Call Jan 3 2008 - 8am pacific Message-ID: <7BB11D91-9DE7-4309-8C0A-C34775D73300@zenn.net> Alpha delivered. Please join me in a developer phone call to discuss the next steps and to discuss the upcoming interoperability testing this Jan 10. 8 A.M. Pacific / 11 A.M. Eastern * US/Canada 866.411.0013, pin 0123586# * Outside US/Canada 734.615.7474, pin 0123586# * more options here: http://openliberty.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page#Developer_Phone_Calls talk to you then, asa -- Asa Hardcastle, Technical Lead, openLiberty ID-WSF ClientLib Tel: +1.413.429.1044 Skype: subsystem7 From eric at projectliberty.org Thu Jan 3 08:32:18 2008 From: eric at projectliberty.org (Eric Tiffany) Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 11:32:18 -0500 Subject: [wsf-dev] FW: LAP-Tech: Making ID-WSF 1.x era service specifications work over ID-WSF 2.0 In-Reply-To: <1B47D24854C7BC4FA8DA28BEBB59B0BAA2A29B@orsmsx419.amr.corp.intel.com> Message-ID: Here is a message from Greg regarding issues discussed on today's call. I couldn't find the original message, but here is conor's reply agreeing with Greg. ET -- ____________________________________________________ Eric Tiffany | eric at projectliberty.org Interop Tech Lead | +1 413-458-3743 Liberty Alliance | +1 413-627-1778 mobile ------ Forwarded Message From: "Cahill, Conor P" Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 16:08:47 -0700 To: Greg Whitehead , LibertyTech Conversation: LAP-Tech: Making ID-WSF 1.x era service specifications work over ID-WSF 2.0 Subject: RE: LAP-Tech: Making ID-WSF 1.x era service specifications work over ID-WSF 2.0 This looks good to me. Perhaps with an example as well. Conor > -----Original Message----- > From: technology-owner at projectliberty.org > [mailto:technology-owner at projectliberty.org] On Behalf Of > Greg Whitehead > Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 12:31 PM > To: LibertyTech > Subject: LAP-Tech: Making ID-WSF 1.x era service > specifications work over ID-WSF 2.0 > > I propose the following convention for making ID-WSF 1.x era > service specifications work over ID-WSF 2.0, without > requiring any changes to the specifications themselves. This > should allow any existing ID-WSF 1.x specification, such as > PP or EP, to be used in the ID-WSF 2.0 world. > > This would have been good to include in the cross framework > interoperability document. Maybe it can go in a future version. > > 1) ResourceID > > When constructing messages according to the service > specification, use urn:liberty:isf:implied-resource for the > ResourceID. In the case that the service specification makes > ResourceID optional, and defaults to > urn:liberty:isf:implied-resource, then the ResourceID element > should be omitted. > > 2) Action URIs > > For each message defined by the service specification, > construct the action URI for that message by taking the > namespace qualified name of the message element (i.e. the > element that will be placed in the SOAP Body) and > concatenating the namespace with the element name, separated by ':'. > > So, for example, for the PP service the action URIs would be: > > urn:liberty:id-sis-pp:2003-08:Query > urn:liberty:id-sis-pp:2003-08:QueryResponse > urn:liberty:id-sis-pp:2003-08:Modify > urn:liberty:id-sis-pp:2003-08:ModifyResponse > > NOTE: I believe this simple scheme works for both URN and URL > based namespace URIs. > > > -Greg > > Liberty Alliance Confidential > > The contents of this message are considered confidential to > the Liberty Alliance per the Membership Agreement and should > not be shared outside of the Alliance unless otherwise noted > in the body of this email by the original sender. > ______________________________ > > To unsubscribe from this list, login to the Project Liberty > Members Area, edit your profile and unsubscribe yourself > from technology at projectliberty.org. > ______________________________ > > > > > Liberty Alliance Confidential The contents of this message are considered confidential to the Liberty Alliance per the Membership Agreement and should not be shared outside of the Alliance unless otherwise noted in the body of this email by the original sender. ______________________________ To unsubscribe from this list, login to the Project Liberty Members Area, edit your profile and unsubscribe yourself from technology at projectliberty.org. ______________________________ ------ End of Forwarded Message From sampo at directoryscript.org Wed Jan 9 12:33:58 2008 From: sampo at directoryscript.org (sampo at directoryscript.org) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 15:33:58 -0500 Subject: [wsf-dev] CARML examples Message-ID: <1199910838.47852fb63f504@plankton.symlabs.net> Does anyone have a simple example CARML document just to illustrate what this stuff looks like? Cheers, --Sampo From sampo at directoryscript.org Wed Jan 9 12:42:15 2008 From: sampo at directoryscript.org (sampo at directoryscript.org) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 15:42:15 -0500 Subject: [wsf-dev] CARML C and Scripting APIs Message-ID: <1199911335.478531a7af477@plankton.symlabs.net> I wonder about the nature of coming API for CARML. I would like to see a C API that would be converted to script language, and perhaps even Java, APIs using SWIG. Is anyone else interested in this type of effort? Cheers --Sampo From brett at projectliberty.org Thu Jan 17 06:28:20 2008 From: brett at projectliberty.org (Brett McDowell) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:28:20 -0500 Subject: [wsf-dev] is there a call today? Message-ID: <845DED24-878D-4726-9DC0-A15A7A86EF5E@projectliberty.org> If yes, what are the call-in details and agenda? From openliberty at mac.com Thu Jan 17 06:50:17 2008 From: openliberty at mac.com (openliberty at mac.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:50:17 -0500 Subject: [wsf-dev] is there a call today? In-Reply-To: <845DED24-878D-4726-9DC0-A15A7A86EF5E@projectliberty.org> References: <845DED24-878D-4726-9DC0-A15A7A86EF5E@projectliberty.org> Message-ID: Sorry, yes. Regularly scheduled call, 8 A.M. Pacific. I will be putting up a calendar (maybe a google or .mac calendar) with the calls all listed. Agenda: - last week's TEG meeting - last week's interop - ID-SIS-DAP and continuing progress later, asa On Jan 17, 2008, at 9:28 AM, Brett McDowell wrote: > If yes, what are the call-in details and agenda? > > > _______________________________________________ > Wsf-dev mailing list > Wsf-dev at lists.openliberty.org > http://lists.openliberty.org/mailman/listinfo/wsf- > dev_lists.openliberty.org From asa.openliberty at zenn.net Thu Jan 17 06:55:39 2008 From: asa.openliberty at zenn.net (Asa Hardcastle) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:55:39 -0500 Subject: [wsf-dev] Today's Developer Call. 8am Pacific Message-ID: <60018EF1-7348-4AF9-BB59-A42E2DB4FFC5@zenn.net> Hi All, Phone call today at 8am pacific / 11am eastern Agenda: - last week's TEG meeting - last week's interop - ID-SIS-DAP and continuing progress US/Canada 866.411.0013, pin 0123586# Outside US/Canada 734.615.7474, pin 0123586# Other options: http://www.openliberty.org/wiki/index.php/ Main_Page#Developer_Phone_Calls talk to you then! Asa -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openliberty.org/pipermail/wsf-dev_lists.openliberty.org/attachments/20080117/451dc73a/attachment.html From sampo at directoryscript.org Thu Jan 17 07:15:45 2008 From: sampo at directoryscript.org (sampo at directoryscript.org) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:15:45 -0500 Subject: [wsf-dev] Today's Developer Call. 8am Pacific In-Reply-To: <60018EF1-7348-4AF9-BB59-A42E2DB4FFC5@zenn.net> References: <60018EF1-7348-4AF9-BB59-A42E2DB4FFC5@zenn.net> Message-ID: <1200582945.478f7121b9d63@plankton.symlabs.net> Quoting Asa Hardcastle : > Hi All, > > Phone call today at 8am pacific / 11am eastern 11am ET conflicts with RSA08-XACML demo call. --Sampo > Agenda: > > - last week's TEG meeting > - last week's interop > - ID-SIS-DAP and continuing progress > > US/Canada 866.411.0013, pin 0123586# > Outside US/Canada 734.615.7474, pin 0123586# > > Other options: > http://www.openliberty.org/wiki/index.php/ > Main_Page#Developer_Phone_Calls > > > talk to you then! > > Asa From conor.p.cahill at intel.com Thu Jan 17 07:27:47 2008 From: conor.p.cahill at intel.com (Cahill, Conor P) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:27:47 -0800 Subject: [wsf-dev] Today's Developer Call. 8am Pacific In-Reply-To: <1200582945.478f7121b9d63@plankton.symlabs.net> References: <60018EF1-7348-4AF9-BB59-A42E2DB4FFC5@zenn.net> <1200582945.478f7121b9d63@plankton.symlabs.net> Message-ID: <1B47D24854C7BC4FA8DA28BEBB59B0BA02DAFFB7@orsmsx419.amr.corp.intel.com> I won't be on the call either as I've got an Intel meeting conflict. Conor > -----Original Message----- > From: wsf-dev-bounces at lists.openliberty.org [mailto:wsf-dev- > bounces at lists.openliberty.org] On Behalf Of sampo at directoryscript.org > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 10:16 AM > To: Asa Hardcastle > Cc: wsf-dev at openliberty.org; sampo at symlabs.com > Subject: Re: [wsf-dev] Today's Developer Call. 8am Pacific > > Quoting Asa Hardcastle : > > Hi All, > > > > Phone call today at 8am pacific / 11am eastern > > 11am ET conflicts with RSA08-XACML demo call. > > --Sampo > > > Agenda: > > > > - last week's TEG meeting > > - last week's interop > > - ID-SIS-DAP and continuing progress > > > > US/Canada 866.411.0013, pin 0123586# > > Outside US/Canada 734.615.7474, pin 0123586# > > > > Other options: > > http://www.openliberty.org/wiki/index.php/ > > Main_Page#Developer_Phone_Calls > > > > > > talk to you then! > > > > Asa > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wsf-dev mailing list > Wsf-dev at lists.openliberty.org > http://lists.openliberty.org/mailman/listinfo/wsf- > dev_lists.openliberty.org