[wsf-dev] [Igf-dev] Fwd: Naming of WSF and IGF

[Scott Cantor]

> IGF is orthogonal to the ID-WSF code.  ID-WSF is just one protocol/
> family that IGF will support. For example, IGF has to support other
> protocols including non-federation protocols like LDAP.

I never implied otherwise.

> While there is obviously a key "intersecting" relationship here, to
> say there is a hierarchical one would be *extremely* problematic and
> be a disservice to either project by artificially limiting their
> respective potential "mindshare".

I see nothing about the OpenLiberty name that implies WSF. It implies
Liberty, but if that alone is an issue, I'm not sure what the code is doing
here to begin with.

> I think Asa has it right. There are several projects running under a
> common organization. Following the Apache model might be the best way
> to go.

There is no Apache model. Apache leaves naming up to each project. That
means a bunch of arguments instead of one, and that's all I was trying to
avoid. If you have the appetite, have at it.

-- Scott