The only reason I can think of to not use openLiberty in the name might be our longer-term goal of getting these projects into the Apache Software Foundation. Otherwise I don't know why we couldn't use openLiberty in the name.<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Scott Cantor <<a href="mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu">cantor.2@osu.edu</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">> Also, I think "ID-WSF 2.0 ClientLib" is a bit dry for an open source<br>
> project name, do any of you have ideas for a name or naming?<br>
<br>
</div>Well, we went through this before and were unable to agree on anything very<br>
profound.<br>
<br>
I wasn't too happy with the choice, but I doubt any opinions have changed<br>
much. The main problem, IIRC, was an inability to use the term openLiberty<br>
as part of the name for some reason...<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
-- Scott<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wsf-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Wsf-dev@lists.openliberty.org">Wsf-dev@lists.openliberty.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openliberty.org/mailman/listinfo/wsf-dev_lists.openliberty.org" target="_blank">http://lists.openliberty.org/mailman/listinfo/wsf-dev_lists.openliberty.org</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Brett McDowell, +1-413-652-1248, <a href="http://www.projectliberty.org">www.projectliberty.org</a>