Did you literally mean "openLiberty-J" or is "-J" a placeholder for a name for this subproject TBD?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Scott Cantor <<a href="mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu">cantor.2@osu.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d">> The only reason I can think of to not use openLiberty in the name might be<br>
> our longer-term goal of getting these projects into the Apache Software<br>
> Foundation. Otherwise I don't know why we couldn't use openLiberty in the<br>
> name.<br>
<br>
</div>My recollection was that it was something to do with keeping the overall<br>
name disconnected from any specific deliverable, or something like that.<br>
<br>
Personally, I would simplify things by casting all this work as<br>
OpenLiberty-J and just nailing down the specific supported features (WSF<br>
client, server, etc) in the docs. But I argued for that originally and it<br>
didn't win, so...<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
-- Scott<br>
<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Brett McDowell, +1-413-652-1248, <a href="http://www.projectliberty.org">www.projectliberty.org</a>