When people talk about those projects (Xerces-J, Xerces-C, OpenSAML-J, etc.) what do they say out loud? Do they say "xerces Java code" and "openSAML's Java stack" etc., or do they say "xerces-C" and "openSAML-C" etc.? For example I have only ever heard of openSAML as "openSAML" but I knew there was both a C version and a Java version. So if that flies maybe we could name our project openLiberty-J and openLiberty-C but it would be "openLiberty" in discussion.<br>
<br>To Curtis and Asa: there is a problem using "LID". Not only is openLID too close to OpenID, but LID is the name of another initiative in this space "Lightweight IDentity".<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Scott Cantor <<a href="mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu">cantor.2@osu.edu</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">> Did you literally mean "openLiberty-J" or is "-J" a placeholder for a name<br>
> for this subproject TBD?<br>
<br>
</div>No, I mean literally. Xerces is split into Xerces-J and Xerces-C, for<br>
example, as is OpenSAML (because I copied it).<br>
<br>
Basically, I don't think deployers out there understand or care about any<br>
distinctions inside ID-WSF. If they're at all interested, they'll expect the<br>
package to include it all and just need to know what's actually implemented<br>
inside the release notes.<br>
<br>
In Java, in particular, you only load classes that you use, so it doesn't<br>
matter how much you bundle into one.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
-- Scott<br>
<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Brett McDowell, +1-413-652-1248, <a href="http://www.projectliberty.org">www.projectliberty.org</a>